Even though the theological concept of God and Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy might seem unrelated, there are many parallels to consider. To accurately delve into this question, definitions are a must. What “God” is being used in this comparison? What is Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy ( now known as Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another)?

What “God” is being used in this comparison?

The God being discussed in this blog post is the “god” of high-demand religion. This god teaches his creation that they are broken, unworthy, sinners that need redemption (a cure). Simply, this god tells his creation that they are “sick” and in need of treatment. Children are taught they are so unworthy and “unwell” that they deserve eternal punishment in hell. Many children learn this before they can tie their shoes, therefore, children are learning that they are “sick”, even though they’re not. These children and adults learn that they are so unworthy and unwell that another human/God had to die a bloody death to cover up their sickness.

What is Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another (FDIA)?  (formerly Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy)

Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another (FDIA), is a mental health disorder in which a caregiver, typically a parent or guardian, exaggerates, fabricates, or induces physical or psychological symptoms in someone under their care. This behavior is done to portray the person as sick, injured, or in need of medical attention.

The person who is being subjected to this behavior is usually not aware of the deception and may undergo unnecessary medical tests, procedures, or even treatments.

The motivations behind FDIA can vary, but they often include a need for attention, sympathy, or a desire to assume the role of a dedicated caregiver. This condition is considered a form of abuse, as it can lead to serious physical and psychological harm to the person being manipulated.

It’s important to note that this is a complex and serious mental health issue, and individuals exhibiting this behavior, as well as those affected by it, may require professional intervention and support. If you suspect someone is involved in FDIA, it is crucial to report it to the appropriate authorities or seek help from a healthcare professional.

Key Similarities of God and Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another (FDIA)

Control and Manipulation:

• In FDIA, a caregiver exerts control by feigning or exaggerating illness in the person under their care.
• Similarly, high-demand religions can exert control by emphasizing the inherent brokenness and unworthiness of humanity, leading to a sense of dependency and obedience within the faith community. 

Fabricated Narratives and Influence

• Fabricated narratives are constructed in both cases to shape perceptions and behavior.
• The high-demand God asserts that humans are inherently flawed, broken, and in need of redemption.
• In FDIA, a caregiver imposes a narrative of illness or need for medical attention on the person under their care.
• Both high-demand religions and FDIA foster a sense of dependency, whether on a higher power or the caregiver, respectively.

Potential for Psychological Impact:

• Both situations have the potential for profound psychological impact.
• Believing in the narrative of the high-demand God can lead to feelings of unworthiness, guilt, shame, and fear.
• Similarly, individuals subjected to FDIA may experience confusion, distrust, and emotional distress.
• Individuals subjected to FDIA and those influenced by high-demand religions may experience a significant impact on their self-worth, identity and ability to perceive reality correctly. 

Liberation and Healing:

• Recognizing and addressing both FDIA and certain interpretations of religious teachings is crucial for liberation and healing.
• Therapy, support groups, and open dialogue provide avenues for recovery in cases of FDIA and religious trauma.
• Engaging in critical theological reflection and exploring alternative interpretations of religious texts can lead to a more inclusive and empowering spiritual experience.

These shared themes underscore the complexities and potential consequences of control, manipulation, and influence in various contexts. Recognizing these parallels allows for a deeper understanding of these complex phenomena and promotes empathy and respect for diverse beliefs and experiences.

Questions to consider:

Who benefits from influencing another person into believing they are sick and in need of treatment?

Why does a god need his creation to believe that they are broken, unwell, and wicked? How is that God benefitting from this narrative?

Since the abusers are overwhelmingly the mothers, how does this correlate to women growing up in an oppressive patriarchal system? Are these women seeking attention because they grew up neglected?

What are the religious backgrounds of the abusers? Did these women grow up in an oppressive religious system learning they’re beneath men and broken sinners?

How might societal norms and expectations play a role in perpetuating these dynamics of control and manipulation within both religious contexts and instances of FDIA?

Are there specific religious doctrines or interpretations that are more likely to lead to a sense of inherent brokenness and unworthiness in believers?

How do cultural and regional differences influence the prevalence of high-demand religions and instances of FDIA?

Are there any ethical or moral dilemmas associated with using religious teachings to instill a sense of unworthiness or sinfulness in individuals?

What impact can exposure to these belief systems have on an individual’s mental health, particularly in terms of anxiety, depression, or self-esteem?

How might individuals who have experienced either high-demand religions or FDIA find support, healing, and a sense of empowerment in their journey towards recovery?

Are there any societal or legal measures in place to identify and address cases of FDIA, particularly in situations where it may be intertwined with religious beliefs?

What role can education and awareness play in preventing or mitigating the potential harm associated with high-demand religions and instances of FDIA?

How can mental health professionals and religious leaders work together to support individuals who have been affected by these dynamics?

Are there any potential positive aspects or benefits that individuals may derive from their experiences within high-demand religious settings, or in their journey towards recovery from FDIA?

These questions aim to encourage critical thinking and discussion on the complex and multifaceted issues surrounding high-demand religions, FDIA, and their potential impacts on individuals and communities.

Read article below for an ad-free, more personal look into challenging the doctrine of inherent wickedness by comparing it to Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy.

The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.